The Genspark alternative with every model behind the agent
Genspark built agentic search into a product: pose a question, and an agent researches and assembles something rather than handing back links. Zeplik does that research work too, and puts a full studio around it -- 285 models you switch between mid-thread, 900 connected apps, collections of your own documents cited by page, image, music and video generation, and a website builder that publishes.
Free to start. No credit card required.
Last updated . Zeplik figures are read live from the model registry.
- 285
- models in one chat
- 468
- ready-to-run skills
- Image, music, video
- generation built in
- One balance
- covers all of it
Start the way you start in Genspark, with a research question an agent should go and answer. Then keep going in the same thread: change the model, pull in your own documents, act in a connected app, or turn the result into a page that is actually live.
Zeplik vs Genspark
| Feature | Zeplik | Genspark |
|---|---|---|
| Deep research | Multi-step research runs with web grounding and verified-source tools | Agentic search is the core of the product |
| Models available | 285 models across 53 labs, switchable mid-thread | Mixture of models chosen by the product |
| Connected apps | 900 connected apps on every paid plan | A set of built-in agents and tools |
| Your own documents | Collections read to a fixed ceiling and cited by page, per project or per chat | Files per task rather than a persistent cited library |
| Publishes a website | Yes, a real site the builder deploys to a live address | Generates pages and documents |
| Media generation | Image, music and video in the same chat, on the same balance | Image and video generation available |
Why people switch to Zeplik
Research, then everything after it
A finished research answer is usually the middle of the job, not the end. In Zeplik the draft, the chart, the deck, the published page and the scheduled re-run all happen in the thread the research happened in, using any of 285 models.
Your documents are part of the research
Public web research is only half of most real questions. Put your own reports, contracts or spreadsheets in a collection and the answer draws on them too, with the page it came from cited rather than paraphrased.
The agent can act, not just assemble
With 900 connected apps available, the result of a research run can become a row in a sheet, a message to a channel or a record in a CRM, instead of a document you then copy things out of.
One balance, every capability
Research, agent runs, connectors, collections, scheduled tasks, image, music, video and the website builder all draw on one credit balance, and all of them are on every paid plan.
Where Genspark is the better pick
No tool wins at everything. Here is where Genspark is genuinely the stronger choice, so you can decide honestly.
- A purpose-built research surface. Genspark presents an agentic search result as a designed artifact rather than a chat transcript, and that presentation is genuinely good. Zeplik's research lands in a conversation, which is more flexible and less composed.
- Opinionated agents. Prebuilt agents for specific jobs mean less setup for those jobs. Zeplik gives you the parts and the choice, which is an advantage when your task is yours and a cost when you wanted it already assembled.
How to try Zeplik
Create a free account
Sign up in seconds with free starting credits, and ask the kind of research question you would take to Genspark.
Add what only you have
Attach a collection of your own documents so the research draws on your material as well as the public web, cited by page.
Turn the answer into the thing
In the same thread, draft it, chart it, publish it as a site, or send it into a connected app, then schedule the whole run to repeat.
Frequently asked questions
- What is Genspark?
- Genspark is an agentic search product: instead of returning links, it runs an agent that researches a question and assembles a result, such as a generated page or a sheet.
- Is Zeplik a good alternative to Genspark?
- Yes, if you want the research to connect to the rest of your work. Zeplik runs deep research and adds 285 models you can switch between, 900 connected apps, collections of your own documents cited by page, media generation and a website builder. It is free to start.
- Can Zeplik research my own documents as well as the web?
- Yes. A collection attached to a chat or project is read alongside web results, and the answer cites the page it drew from.
- How much does Zeplik cost?
- Free to start, then Plus at $20, Pro at $40 or Max at $80 per month. Every capability is on every plan; the tier sets your monthly credit allowance.
The bottom line
Genspark is strong at agentic search and the artifacts it produces from it. Zeplik covers that ground and then keeps going: 285 models to switch between, 900 apps to act in, your own documents cited by page, media generation and a builder that publishes a real site. Free to start.
Zeplik compared with other assistants
- Zeplik vs ManusAutonomous agentAn agent that runs long multi-step tasks, plus 285 models, 900 connected apps and collections it can read, in one chat.
- Zeplik vs ChatGPTSingle-provider assistantOne subscription that gives you OpenAI plus Anthropic, Google, xAI and more in a single chat, with image, music and video generation built in.
- Zeplik vs ClaudeSingle-provider assistantKeep Claude's strengths and add OpenAI, Google, xAI and media generation in the same chat, on one credit balance.
- Zeplik vs GeminiSingle-provider assistantUse Gemini's long-context strengths plus OpenAI, Anthropic and xAI in one chat, with image, music and video generation on a single balance.
- Zeplik vs PerplexityAnswer engineGet web-grounded answers plus full multi-model chat, image, music and video generation and 465 skills, all in one app.
- Zeplik vs PoeMulti-model aggregatorA multi-model chat like Poe, plus image, music and video generation, 465 skills and grounding tools, on one clear credit balance.
- Zeplik vs Microsoft CopilotEcosystem assistantA model-neutral assistant that is not tied to one vendor's stack, with every major model, media generation and 465 skills in one chat.
- Zeplik vs GrokSingle-provider assistantKeep Grok's freshness and add OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and media generation in the same chat, on one credit balance.
- Zeplik vs DeepSeekSingle-provider assistantKeep DeepSeek's reasoning value and add OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and media generation in one chat, on one credit balance.
- Zeplik vs Meta AIEcosystem assistantAn assistant outside the social apps: Llama plus OpenAI, Anthropic and Google in one chat, with media generation and 465 skills.
- Zeplik vs Mistral Le ChatSingle-provider assistantA multi-model studio next to Le Chat's single-provider focus: every major US and Chinese frontier lab in one chat, plus media generation.
- Zeplik vs JasperMarketing writing toolMarketing copy plus everything after it: every frontier model, image, music and video generation and 465 skills, on one balance.
- Zeplik vs You.comMulti-model aggregatorMulti-model chat like You.com, plus first-party image, music and video generation, 465 curated skills and grounding tools, on one clear balance.
- Zeplik vs ChatlyMulti-model assistantThe same multi-model idea without the per-tier limits: every connector, every collection and every skill on every paid plan.
- Zeplik vs LovableAI app builderDescribe a site and watch it ship, with the code in your own GitHub and the chat that built it still open beside it.
- Zeplik vs ChatGPT PlusSingle-provider subscriptionOne subscription that covers every lab instead of one, with media generation and connected apps on the same balance.
- Zeplik vs TypingMindBring-your-own-key chat frontendA chat frontend without the API-key homework: no provider accounts to open, no keys to rotate, and media generation in the same thread.
- Zeplik vs MonicaAll-in-one assistant extensionThe same all-in-one promise with the plan wall removed: every model, connector and skill on every paid tier.
- Zeplik vs ChatHubSide-by-side chatbot comparisonSide-by-side answers are the start, not the product: compare models, then keep working in the thread that won.
- Zeplik vs MerlinBrowser-extension assistantBeyond the browser overlay: connected apps that act, document collections that cite, and media generation on one balance.
- Zeplik vs OpenRouterModel API routerThe same reach across every lab, as a finished product rather than an API you build against.
- Zeplik vs T3 ChatFast multi-model chatThe same fast multi-model chat, with the rest of the job attached: documents, connectors, media and a sandbox.
- Zeplik vs BoltAI app builderThe same chat-to-ship loop, inside an assistant that also researches, writes and generates the images the site needs.
- Zeplik vs ReplitAI app builderFor sites rather than a whole IDE: describe it, let it check its own work, publish it, and keep the code.
- Zeplik vs HiggsfieldAI video and image studioGenerate video and images, then keep going in the same chat with 285 models, 900 connected apps and a site that publishes.
More on Zeplik
- Every modelBrowse the frontier models Zeplik routes between in a single chat.
- 468 AI skillsReady-to-run expert workflows that run on any model you pick.
- 997 integrationsConnect Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Notion and hundreds more.
- Simple pricingPlus, Pro and Max plans with one credit balance across every model and media type.
- All comparisonsSee how Zeplik compares to other AI assistants and answer engines.
- Compare AI modelsClaude against GPT against Gemini, side by side on price, context window and what each is best at.
- All toolsImage, video, music, documents, research and more, in one place.
Research that connects to the rest of the job
Start free, ask the hard question, then build, publish or schedule the answer in the same thread.