The ChatHub alternative that keeps working after the comparison
ChatHub's idea is a good one: put several chatbots next to each other and see which answers best. Zeplik takes the same idea further. You switch model inside one conversation rather than running parallel windows, and when a model wins you carry on in that thread with documents, connected apps, code execution and media generation attached.
Free to start. No credit card required.
Last updated . Zeplik figures are read live from the model registry.
- 285
- models in one chat
- 468
- ready-to-run skills
- Image, music, video
- generation built in
- One balance
- covers all of it
Comparing answers is a step in the work, not the work. Zeplik lets you change model mid-thread and then finish the job in the same place.
Zeplik vs ChatHub
| Feature | Zeplik | ChatHub |
|---|---|---|
| How models are compared | Switch model inside one conversation and keep the whole history; ask the next model to build on the last answer | Several chatbots answer the same prompt side by side in parallel panes |
| After the comparison | The winning thread continues with 900 connected apps, document collections, a code sandbox and scheduled tasks | A comparison surface; the work moves elsewhere |
| Media generation | Image, music and video generation in the same chat, on the same balance | Text chat comparison focused |
| Where it runs | Web, Mac, iOS, Android and a Chrome extension, with history synced across all of them | Browser extension and web app |
| What a plan buys | Credits, and nothing else is gated: every model, connector, skill and media type is on every paid plan | A subscription for the comparison interface |
Why people switch to Zeplik
One thread beats four panes
Parallel panes answer the first question well and the second one badly, because each pane has only its own history. Switching model inside one conversation means the next model sees everything that came before, including the answer you liked.
The comparison is not the deliverable
You compared the models to get a better answer, and the answer usually has to become something: a document, a deck, a published page, a message sent into a connected app. Zeplik does that part in the same thread.
Media in the same conversation
A piece of writing often needs an image, and a video script often needs the video. Zeplik generates images, music and video from the same balance, in the same chat, rather than sending you to three more products.
Your own documents, cited
Upload a collection and the chat reads it and cites the page it used. A comparison tool answers from the model's own knowledge; grounding in your material is a different capability.
Where ChatHub is the better pick
No tool wins at everything. Here is where ChatHub is genuinely the stronger choice, so you can decide honestly.
- Genuinely simultaneous answers. Seeing four replies appear at once is the clearest possible comparison and Zeplik does not do that. Switching model inside a thread is sequential by design.
- It can drive your own accounts. A browser extension can use chatbot sessions you are already signed into, which means your existing subscriptions keep their value. Zeplik routes through its own provider relationships instead.
- Lighter by design. If all you want is a comparison pane and nothing else, a focused tool is less to learn than an assistant with connectors, collections and a builder in it.
How to try Zeplik
Create a free account
Email or Google, free credits on arrival, no card.
Ask once, then switch
Send your prompt, read the answer, then change model from the picker and ask the same thread to try again.
Keep the winner working
Attach a document collection, connect an app, or ask for the image, and finish in the same conversation.
Frequently asked questions
- Can Zeplik show two models answering at once?
- No. Zeplik switches model inside one conversation instead, so each model sees the full history rather than only its own pane. If simultaneous side-by-side output is the feature you want, a comparison tool does it more directly.
- How many models can I switch between?
- 285 models from 53 labs, including Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, xAI, DeepSeek and Mistral. The model is chosen per message.
- Do I need separate subscriptions to each AI provider?
- No. One Zeplik balance covers every model and every media type. Credits are 1 credit = $0.10 of model usage, billed per token against the provider's own price.
- Is there a browser extension?
- Yes, alongside the web app and the Mac, iOS and Android apps, with history synced across all of them.
The bottom line
ChatHub is a neat answer to one question: which chatbot handles this prompt best. If that is the whole job, it does it directly. If the answer then has to turn into work, Zeplik is the alternative: the same multi-model freedom, in one thread, with the tools to finish attached. Free to start.
Zeplik compared with other assistants
- Zeplik vs ManusAutonomous agentAn agent that runs long multi-step tasks, plus 285 models, 900 connected apps and collections it can read, in one chat.
- Zeplik vs GensparkAgentic search and sheetsAgent work, generated pages and deep research, plus 285 models and 900 connected apps on one balance.
- Zeplik vs ChatGPTSingle-provider assistantOne subscription that gives you OpenAI plus Anthropic, Google, xAI and more in a single chat, with image, music and video generation built in.
- Zeplik vs ClaudeSingle-provider assistantKeep Claude's strengths and add OpenAI, Google, xAI and media generation in the same chat, on one credit balance.
- Zeplik vs GeminiSingle-provider assistantUse Gemini's long-context strengths plus OpenAI, Anthropic and xAI in one chat, with image, music and video generation on a single balance.
- Zeplik vs PerplexityAnswer engineGet web-grounded answers plus full multi-model chat, image, music and video generation and 465 skills, all in one app.
- Zeplik vs PoeMulti-model aggregatorA multi-model chat like Poe, plus image, music and video generation, 465 skills and grounding tools, on one clear credit balance.
- Zeplik vs Microsoft CopilotEcosystem assistantA model-neutral assistant that is not tied to one vendor's stack, with every major model, media generation and 465 skills in one chat.
- Zeplik vs GrokSingle-provider assistantKeep Grok's freshness and add OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and media generation in the same chat, on one credit balance.
- Zeplik vs DeepSeekSingle-provider assistantKeep DeepSeek's reasoning value and add OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and media generation in one chat, on one credit balance.
- Zeplik vs Meta AIEcosystem assistantAn assistant outside the social apps: Llama plus OpenAI, Anthropic and Google in one chat, with media generation and 465 skills.
- Zeplik vs Mistral Le ChatSingle-provider assistantA multi-model studio next to Le Chat's single-provider focus: every major US and Chinese frontier lab in one chat, plus media generation.
- Zeplik vs JasperMarketing writing toolMarketing copy plus everything after it: every frontier model, image, music and video generation and 465 skills, on one balance.
- Zeplik vs You.comMulti-model aggregatorMulti-model chat like You.com, plus first-party image, music and video generation, 465 curated skills and grounding tools, on one clear balance.
- Zeplik vs ChatlyMulti-model assistantThe same multi-model idea without the per-tier limits: every connector, every collection and every skill on every paid plan.
- Zeplik vs LovableAI app builderDescribe a site and watch it ship, with the code in your own GitHub and the chat that built it still open beside it.
- Zeplik vs ChatGPT PlusSingle-provider subscriptionOne subscription that covers every lab instead of one, with media generation and connected apps on the same balance.
- Zeplik vs TypingMindBring-your-own-key chat frontendA chat frontend without the API-key homework: no provider accounts to open, no keys to rotate, and media generation in the same thread.
- Zeplik vs MonicaAll-in-one assistant extensionThe same all-in-one promise with the plan wall removed: every model, connector and skill on every paid tier.
- Zeplik vs MerlinBrowser-extension assistantBeyond the browser overlay: connected apps that act, document collections that cite, and media generation on one balance.
- Zeplik vs OpenRouterModel API routerThe same reach across every lab, as a finished product rather than an API you build against.
- Zeplik vs T3 ChatFast multi-model chatThe same fast multi-model chat, with the rest of the job attached: documents, connectors, media and a sandbox.
- Zeplik vs BoltAI app builderThe same chat-to-ship loop, inside an assistant that also researches, writes and generates the images the site needs.
- Zeplik vs ReplitAI app builderFor sites rather than a whole IDE: describe it, let it check its own work, publish it, and keep the code.
- Zeplik vs HiggsfieldAI video and image studioGenerate video and images, then keep going in the same chat with 285 models, 900 connected apps and a site that publishes.
More on Zeplik
- Every modelBrowse the frontier models Zeplik routes between in a single chat.
- 468 AI skillsReady-to-run expert workflows that run on any model you pick.
- 997 integrationsConnect Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Notion and hundreds more.
- Simple pricingPlus, Pro and Max plans with one credit balance across every model and media type.
- All comparisonsSee how Zeplik compares to other AI assistants and answer engines.
- Compare AI modelsClaude against GPT against Gemini, side by side on price, context window and what each is best at.
- All toolsImage, video, music, documents, research and more, in one place.
Compare, then finish the job
Start free, put two models on the same question, and carry the better answer straight into the work.