Meeting Insights Analyzer
Business operations skill, available on Zeplik
Meeting Insights Analyzer is a ready-to-run business operations skill on Zeplik. Use when the user shares meeting transcripts or recordings and wants communication coaching: 'analyze how I ran this meeting', spotting conflict avoidance, filler words, speaking ratios, interruptions, and missed listening moments across meetings, with concrete examples and improvement feedback. Ask in plain language and Zeplik applies the skill's method for you inside the conversation, on whichever AI model you prefer.
The Meeting Insights Analyzer skill loads automatically when your request matches it, or you can invoke it directly by typing /meeting-insights-analyzer in any chat. It works with attachments, connectors, and any model that supports the task, so you get the same expert method every time without setting anything up.
What the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill can do
- Scan meeting transcripts for recurring communication patterns
- Detect conflict avoidance through hedging and indirect phrasing
- Calculate speaking ratios, interruptions, and filler word frequency
- Deliver timestamped examples with concrete improvement suggestions
Try these prompts on Zeplik
Pick a prompt to open it in the Zeplik app. If you are not signed in yet, your prompt is waiting for you the moment you do.
How the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill works
Meeting Insights Analyzer
This skill transforms your meeting transcripts into actionable insights about your communication patterns, helping you become a more effective communicator and leader.
When to Use This Skill
- Analyzing your communication patterns across multiple meetings
- Getting feedback on your leadership and facilitation style
- Identifying when you avoid difficult conversations
- Understanding your speaking habits and filler words
- Tracking improvement in communication skills over time
- Preparing for performance reviews with concrete examples
- Coaching team members on their communication style
What This Skill Does
-
Pattern Recognition: Identifies recurring behaviors across meetings like:
- Conflict avoidance or indirect communication
- Speaking ratios and turn-taking
- Question-asking vs. statement-making patterns
- Active listening indicators
- Decision-making approaches
-
Communication Analysis: Evaluates communication effectiveness:
- Clarity and directness
- Use of filler words and hedging language
- Tone and sentiment patterns
- Meeting control and facilitation
-
Actionable Feedback: Provides specific, timestamped examples with:
- What happened
- Why it matters
- How to improve
-
Trend Tracking: Compares patterns over time when analyzing multiple meetings
How to Use
Basic Setup
- Download your meeting transcripts to a folder (e.g.,
~/meetings/) - Navigate to that folder in Claude Code
- Ask for the analysis you want
Quick Start Examples
Analyze all meetings in this folder and tell me when I avoided conflict.
Look at my meetings from the past month and identify my communication patterns.
Compare my facilitation style between these two meeting folders.
Advanced Analysis
Analyze all transcripts in this folder and:
1. Identify when I interrupted others
2. Calculate my speaking ratio
3. Find moments I avoided giving direct feedback
4. Track my use of filler words
5. Show examples of good active listening
Instructions
When a user requests meeting analysis:
-
Discover Available Data
- Scan the folder for transcript files (.txt, .md, .vtt, .srt, .docx)
- Check if files contain speaker labels and timestamps
- Confirm the date range of meetings
- Identify the user's name/identifier in transcripts
-
Clarify Analysis Goals
If not specified, ask what they want to learn:
- Specific behaviors (conflict avoidance, interruptions, filler words)
- Communication effectiveness (clarity, directness, listening)
- Meeting facilitation skills
- Speaking patterns and ratios
- Growth areas for improvement
-
Analyze Patterns
For each requested insight:
Conflict Avoidance:
- Look for hedging language ("maybe", "kind of", "I think")
- Indirect phrasing instead of direct requests
- Changing subject when tension arises
- Agreeing without commitment ("yeah, but...")
- Not addressing obvious problems
Speaking Ratios:
- Calculate percentage of meeting spent speaking
- Count interruptions (by and of the user)
- Measure average speaking turn length
- Track question vs. statement ratios
Filler Words:
- Count "um", "uh", "like", "you know", "actually", etc.
- Note frequency per minute or per speaking turn
- Identify situations where they increase (nervous, uncertain)
Active Listening:
- Questions that reference others' previous points
- Paraphrasing or summarizing others' ideas
- Building on others' contributions
- Asking clarifying questions
Leadership & Facilitation:
- Decision-making approach (directive vs. collaborative)
- How disagreements are handled
- Inclusion of quieter participants
- Time management and agenda control
- Follow-up and action item clarity
-
Provide Specific Examples
For each pattern found, include:
### [Pattern Name] **Finding**: [One-sentence summary of the pattern] **Frequency**: [X times across Y meetings] **Examples**: 1. **[Meeting Name/Date]** - [Timestamp] **What Happened**: > [Actual quote from transcript] **Why This Matters**: [Explanation of the impact or missed opportunity] **Better Approach**: [Specific alternative phrasing or behavior] [Repeat for 2-3 strongest examples] -
Synthesize Insights
After analyzing all patterns, provide:
# Meeting Insights Summary **Analysis Period**: [Date range] **Meetings Analyzed**: [X meetings] **Total Duration**: [X hours] ## Key Patterns Identified ### 1. [Primary Pattern] - **Observed**: [What you saw] - **Impact**: [Why it matters] - **Recommendation**: [How to improve] ### 2. [Second Pattern] [Same structure] ## Communication Strengths 1. [Strength 1 with example] 2. [Strength 2 with example] 3. [Strength 3 with example] ## Growth Opportunities 1. **[Area 1]**: [Specific, actionable advice] 2. **[Area 2]**: [Specific, actionable advice] 3. **[Area 3]**: [Specific, actionable advice] ## Speaking Statistics - Average speaking time: [X% of meeting] - Questions asked: [X per meeting average] - Filler words: [X per minute] - Interruptions: [X given / Y received per meeting] ## Next Steps [3-5 concrete actions to improve communication] -
Offer Follow-Up Options
- Track these same metrics in future meetings
- Deep dive into specific meetings or patterns
- Compare to industry benchmarks
- Create a personal communication development plan
- Generate a summary for performance reviews
Examples
Example 1: Conflict Avoidance Analysis (Inspired by Dan Shipper)
User: "I download all of my meeting recordings and put them in a folder. Tell me all the times I've subtly avoided conflict."
Output:
# Conflict Avoidance Patterns
Found 23 instances across 15 meetings where you used indirect
communication or avoided addressing tensions directly.
## Pattern: Hedging on Critical Feedback
**Frequency**: 8 times across 7 meetings
**Example 1: 1:1 with Sarah** - 00:14:32
**What Happened**:
> "So, I was thinking... maybe we could, like, potentially
> consider looking at the timeline again? I mean, if you
> think that makes sense. But whatever you think is best!"
**Why This Matters**:
You needed to address that Sarah's project was behind schedule,
but the hedging language ("maybe", "potentially", "if you think")
and the deflection at the end ("whatever you think") made it easy
for her to miss the urgency.
**Better Approach**:
"Sarah, the project is two weeks behind schedule. We need to
discuss what's blocking progress and create a new timeline
today."
[Additional examples...]
## Recommendations
1. **Name the issue directly** in the first sentence
2. **Remove hedging words** like "maybe," "kind of," "sort of"
3. **Ask specific questions** instead of hinting
4. **Schedule difficult conversations** instead of raising them casually
Example 2: Leadership Facilitation
User: "Analyze my team meetings and tell me about my facilitation style."
Output: Provides insights on:
- How much you speak vs. team members (60% vs. 40%)
- Whether you ask questions or make statements (3:1 ratio)
- How you handle disagreements (tendency to resolve too quickly)
- Who speaks least and whether you draw them in
- Examples of good and missed facilitation moments
Example 3: Personal Development Tracking
User: "Compare my meetings from Q1 vs. Q2 to see if I've improved my listening skills."
Output: Creates a comparative analysis showing:
- Decrease in interruptions (8 per meeting → 3 per meeting)
- Increase in clarifying questions (2 → 7 per meeting)
- Improvement in building on others' ideas
- Specific examples showing the difference
- Remaining areas for growth
Setup Tips
Getting Meeting Transcripts
From Granola (free with Lenny's newsletter subscription):
- Granola auto-transcribes your meetings
- Export transcripts to a folder: [Instructions on how]
- Point Claude Code to that folder
From Zoom:
- Enable cloud recording with transcription
- Download VTT or SRT files after meetings
- Store in a dedicated folder
From Google Meet:
- Use Google Docs auto-transcription
- Save transcript docs to a folder
- Download as .txt files or give Claude Code access
From Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, etc.:
- Export transcripts in bulk
- Store in a local folder
- Run analysis on the folder
Best Practices
- Consistent naming: Use
YYYY-MM-DD - Meeting Name.txtformat - Regular analysis: Review monthly or quarterly for trends
- Specific queries: Ask about one behavior at a time for depth
- Privacy: Keep sensitive meeting data local
- Action-oriented: Focus on one improvement area at a time
Common Analysis Requests
- "When do I avoid difficult conversations?"
- "How often do I interrupt others?"
- "What's my speaking vs. listening ratio?"
- "Do I ask good questions?"
- "How do I handle disagreement?"
- "Am I inclusive of all voices?"
- "Do I use too many filler words?"
- "How clear are my action items?"
- "Do I stay on agenda or get sidetracked?"
- "How has my communication changed over time?"
Related Use Cases
- Creating a personal development plan from insights
- Preparing performance review materials with examples
- Coaching direct reports on their communication
- Analyzing customer calls for sales or support patterns
- Studying negotiation tactics and outcomes
Zeplik output presentation
Present the final deliverable as a single polished artifact: clear headings, tables where the content is tabular, fenced code where it is code. Lead with the deliverable itself; keep process commentary to a single short line. If the skill produced multiple files or sections, end with a compact list of them with one-line purposes.
How to use the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill
Sign in to Zeplik
Create a free Zeplik account or sign in. New accounts start with free credits, so you can try the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill right away.
Describe your business operations task
Ask in plain language, or type /meeting-insights-analyzer to invoke the skill directly. Zeplik recognizes the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill and applies its method.
Review and refine the result
Zeplik returns a clear, structured answer. Ask follow-ups in the same chat to refine it or take the next step.
Source and credit
- Author
- davila7 community
- License
- MIT
Adapted from the open-source davila7/claude-code-templates project and tuned to run natively on Zeplik. View source on GitHub.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill?
- Meeting Insights Analyzer is a ready-to-run business operations skill on Zeplik. Use when the user shares meeting transcripts or recordings and wants communication coaching: 'analyze how I ran this meeting', spotting conflict avoidance, filler words, speaking ratios, interruptions, and missed listening moments across meetings, with concrete examples and improvement feedback. Ask in plain language and Zeplik applies the skill's method for you inside the conversation, on whichever AI model you prefer.
- How do I use Meeting Insights Analyzer on Zeplik?
- Sign in to Zeplik and ask in plain language, or type /meeting-insights-analyzer in any chat to invoke it directly. The skill applies its method and returns a result you can refine in the same conversation.
- Which AI model does the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill use?
- Any model you choose. Zeplik works across every model in one chat, so the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill runs on your preferred model for the task.
- Where does the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill come from?
- The Meeting Insights Analyzer skill is adapted from the open-source davila7/claude-code-templates project (MIT) and tuned to run natively on Zeplik. The original source is linked on this page.
- How much does the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill cost?
- Using the skill is free to start. You only spend Zeplik credits when the assistant runs, and new accounts begin with free credits.
Related business operations skills
- Business Pulse CheckUse when a business owner wants a whole-business snapshot -- 'how is the business doing', 'catch me up on everything', 'what am I missing this week' -- one page: cash, sales, pipeline, commitments, top priority. Not for product metrics deep-dives (use metrics-review) or quarterly reviews (use quarterly-review).
- Capacity PlannerUse for resource capacity planning -- 'do we have the people for next quarter', workload analysis, utilization forecasting, hire-vs-deprioritize calls, stress-testing upcoming projects against the team you have. Not for scoping a single sprint (use sprint-planning).
- CEO AdvisorUse for executive leadership: strategic decisions, board and investor management, org culture, CEO operating rhythm. Not for a morning business status digest (use business-pulse).
- Change Request WriterUse when a system or process change needs formal approval -- 'write a change request for the DB migration', impact analysis, risk and rollback plan, CAB-ready change record, stakeholder comms for the rollout.
- Compliance TrackerUse to track compliance programs and audit readiness -- 'where are we on SOC 2', ISO 27001 / GDPR requirement tracking, evidence collection status, control gaps and remediation owners. Not for checking whether one launch or campaign is compliant (use compliance-check).
- CTO AdvisorUse for technology leadership strategy: engineering org scaling, tech debt, architecture governance, DORA metrics. Not for designing a specific system's architecture (use architecture).
More on Zeplik
Try Meeting Insights Analyzer on Zeplik
Every model, one chat. Bring the Meeting Insights Analyzer skill into your next conversation and let the assistant do the work.