Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5.2
Qwen's capability tier against the GLM 5.2 generation.
Figures as of , read live from the model registry Zeplik bills against.
What the numbers say
- Qwen3.7 Max is about 1.5x cheaper on output tokens (53.1 vs 81.6 credits per 1M).
- GLM 5.2 is the newer release (June 2026 vs May 2026).
Derived from the live registry Zeplik routes and bills against. Credits: 1 credit = $0.10, computed from the raw provider rate with a 1.20x margin.
Side by side
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen
Qwen3.7-Max is the flagship model in Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series.
- Provider
- Qwen
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Input price
- 17.7 credits / 1M tokens ($1.48 raw)
- Output price
- 53.1 credits / 1M tokens ($4.42 raw)
- Vision (image input)
- No
- Tool calling
- Yes
- Extended reasoning
- No
Best for
- Everyday chat and drafting on an open-weight model with transparent lineage
- Very long documents and codebases: a 1M-token window fits entire books or repositories in one conversation
- Tool use and agents: reliably calls functions, so it can search, run skills and drive workflows
GLM 5.2
Z.ai
GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai.
- Provider
- Z.ai
- Context window
- 1.0M tokens
- Input price
- 0.072 credits / 1M tokens ($0.0060 raw)
- Output price
- 81.6 credits / 1M tokens ($6.80 raw)
- Vision (image input)
- No
- Tool calling
- Yes
- Extended reasoning
- No
Best for
- Hard problems where answer quality matters more than cost: strategy, analysis, difficult writing
- Very long documents and codebases: a 1.0M-token window fits entire books or repositories in one conversation
- Tool use and agents: reliably calls functions, so it can search, run skills and drive workflows
Try both on Zeplik
The honest answer to most model debates is to run your own prompt on both. Zeplik puts Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5.2 in the same chat, so you can switch mid-conversation and compare answers on the work you actually do.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5.2?
- Qwen3.7 Max is about 1.5x cheaper on output tokens (53.1 vs 81.6 credits per 1M). GLM 5.2 is the newer release (June 2026 vs May 2026).
- Is Qwen3.7 Max or GLM 5.2 cheaper?
- Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper: 53.1 credits per million output tokens against 81.6. 1 credit = $0.10, computed from the raw provider rate with a 1.20x margin.
- Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.7 Max or GLM 5.2?
- GLM 5.2, at 1.0M tokens against 1M.
- Can I use both Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5.2 on Zeplik?
- Yes. Zeplik is a multi-model chat, so both sit behind one account and you can switch between them mid-conversation to compare answers on your own prompt.
- Do Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5.2 need a paid plan?
- Both need a paid plan (Plus or above). Usage is then billed in credits from your monthly allowance.
Related comparisons
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.7 MaxMeta's open flagship against Alibaba's top Qwen tier.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs GLM 5.2DeepSeek against Z.ai's GLM, both open-weight lines with strong coding results.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen3.7 MaxThe two leading Chinese open-model programs at their respective tops.
- MiniMax M3 vs GLM 5.2Two fast-iterating challengers, MiniMax's M3 against GLM 5.2.
- Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.7 PlusQwen's Max capability tier against the cost-balanced Plus.
- GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.1GLM 5.2 against its immediate predecessor, at a third less per token and five times the context window.
Explore Zeplik
- 468 AI skillsReady-to-run expert methods that run on Qwen3.7 Max, GLM 5.2 or any other model.
- 997 integrationsConnect Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Notion and hundreds more so the assistant can work in your apps.
- Simple pricingPlus, Pro and Max plans with a monthly credit allowance that works across every model.