Legal Response Drafter
Legal and finance skill, available on Zeplik
Legal Response Drafter is a ready-to-run legal and finance skill on Zeplik. Uses templates with built-in escalation checks. Ask in plain language and Zeplik applies the skill's method for you inside the conversation, on whichever AI model you prefer. It returns a structured document you can keep and reuse: Document artifact -- structured written deliverable with headed sections and a TL;DR (see artifact-templates/document.md).
The Legal Response Drafter skill loads automatically when your request matches it, or you can invoke it directly by typing /legal-response in any chat. It works with attachments, connectors, and any model that supports the task, so you get the same expert method every time without setting anything up.
What the Legal Response Drafter skill can do
- Draft responses to DSARs, litigation holds, subpoenas, vendor and NDA inquiries
- Check situations against escalation triggers before templating a response
- Flag matters needing senior or outside counsel review with clear warnings
- Gather required details and populate configured or default response templates
Try these prompts on Zeplik
Pick a prompt to open it in the Zeplik app. If you are not signed in yet, your prompt is waiting for you the moment you do.
How the Legal Response Drafter skill works
/legal-response -- Generate Response from Templates
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Generate a response to a common legal inquiry using configured templates. Customizes the response with specific details and includes escalation triggers for situations that should not use a templated response.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Generated responses should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being sent, especially for regulated communications.
Invocation
/legal-response [inquiry-type]
Common inquiry types:
dsrordata-subject-request-- Data subject access/deletion/correction requestsholdordiscovery-hold-- Litigation hold noticesvendororvendor-question-- Vendor legal questionsndaornda-request-- NDA requests from business teamsprivacyorprivacy-inquiry-- Privacy-related questionssubpoena-- Subpoena or legal process responsesinsurance-- Insurance claim notificationscustom-- Use a custom template
If no inquiry type is provided, ask the user what type of response they need and show available categories.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify Inquiry Type
Accept the inquiry type from the user. If the type is ambiguous, show available categories and ask for clarification.
Step 2: Load Template
Look for templates in local settings (e.g., legal.local.md or a templates directory).
If templates are configured:
- Load the appropriate template for the inquiry type
- Identify required variables (recipient name, dates, specific details)
If no templates are configured:
- Inform the user that no templates were found for this inquiry type
- Offer to help create a template (see Template Creation Guide below)
- Provide a reasonable default response structure based on the inquiry type
Step 3: Check Escalation Triggers
Before generating any response, evaluate whether this situation has characteristics that should NOT use a templated response.
Universal Escalation Triggers (Apply to All Categories)
- The matter involves potential litigation or regulatory investigation
- The inquiry is from a regulator, government agency, or law enforcement
- The response could create a binding legal commitment or waiver
- The matter involves potential criminal liability
- Media attention is involved or likely
- The situation is unprecedented (no prior handling by the team)
- Multiple jurisdictions are involved with conflicting requirements
- The matter involves executive leadership or board members
Data Subject Request Escalation Triggers
- Request involves a minor's data, or is from/on behalf of a minor
- Request is from a regulatory authority (not an individual)
- Request involves data that is subject to a litigation hold
- Requester is a current or former employee with an active dispute or HR matter
- Request scope is unusually broad or appears to be a fishing expedition
- Request involves data processed in a jurisdiction with unique requirements
- Request involves special category data (health, biometric, genetic)
Discovery Hold Escalation Triggers
- The matter involves potential criminal liability
- The preservation scope is unclear, disputed, or potentially overbroad
- There are questions about whether certain data is within scope
- Prior holds for the same or related matter exist
- The hold may affect ongoing business operations significantly
- Hold conflicts with regulatory deletion requirements
- Custodian objects to the hold scope
Vendor Question Escalation Triggers
- The question involves a dispute or potential breach
- The vendor is threatening litigation or termination
- The question involves regulatory compliance (not just contract terms)
- The response could create a binding commitment or waiver
- Response could affect ongoing negotiation
NDA Request Escalation Triggers
- The counterparty is a competitor
- The NDA involves government classified information
- The business context suggests the NDA is for a potential M&A transaction
- The request involves unusual subject matter (AI training data, biometric data, etc.)
Subpoena / Legal Process Escalation Triggers
- ALWAYS requires counsel review (templates are starting points only)
- Privilege issues identified
- Third-party data involved
- Cross-border production issues
- Unreasonable timeline
When an escalation trigger is detected:
- Stop: Do not generate a templated response
- Alert: Inform the user that an escalation trigger has been detected
- Explain: Describe which trigger was detected and why it matters
- Recommend: Suggest the appropriate escalation path (senior counsel, outside counsel, specific team member)
- Offer: Provide a draft for counsel review (clearly marked as "DRAFT - FOR COUNSEL REVIEW ONLY") rather than a final response
Step 4: Gather Specific Details
Prompt the user for the details needed to customize the response:
Data Subject Request:
- Requester name and contact information
- Type of request (access, deletion, correction, portability, opt-out)
- What data is involved
- Applicable regulation (GDPR, CCPA, CPRA, other)
- Response deadline
Discovery Hold:
- Matter name and reference number
- Custodians (who needs to preserve)
- Scope of preservation (date range, data types, systems)
- Outside counsel contact
- Effective date
Vendor Question:
- Vendor name
- Reference agreement (if applicable)
- Specific question being addressed
- Relevant contract provisions
NDA Request:
- Requesting business team and contact
- Counterparty name
- Purpose of the NDA
- Mutual or unilateral
- Any special requirements
Step 5: Generate Response
Populate the template with the gathered details. Ensure the response:
- Uses appropriate tone (professional, clear, not overly legalistic for business audiences)
- Includes all required legal elements for the response type
- References specific dates, deadlines, and obligations
- Provides clear next steps for the recipient
- Includes appropriate disclaimers or caveats
Present the draft response to the user for review before sending.
Customization Guidelines
Required customization — Every templated response MUST be customized with:
- Correct names, dates, and reference numbers
- Specific facts of the situation
- Applicable jurisdiction and regulation
- Correct response deadlines based on when the inquiry was received
- Appropriate signature block and contact information
Tone adjustment — Adjust tone based on:
- Audience: Internal vs. external, business vs. legal, individual vs. regulatory authority
- Relationship: New counterparty vs. existing partner vs. adversarial party
- Sensitivity: Routine inquiry vs. contentious matter vs. regulatory investigation
- Urgency: Standard timeline vs. expedited response needed
Jurisdiction-specific adjustments:
- Verify that cited regulations are correct for the requester's jurisdiction
- Adjust timelines to match applicable law
- Include jurisdiction-specific rights information
- Use jurisdiction-appropriate legal terminology
Step 6: Template Creation (If No Template Exists)
If the user wants to create a new template, walk through the Template Creation Guide (see below) and present the finished template for review. Suggest the user save the approved template to their local settings for future use.
Response Categories
1. Data Subject Requests (DSRs)
Sub-categories:
- Acknowledgment of receipt
- Identity verification request
- Fulfillment response (access, deletion, correction)
- Partial denial with explanation
- Full denial with explanation
- Extension notification
Key template elements:
- Reference to applicable regulation (GDPR, CCPA, etc.)
- Specific timeline for response
- Identity verification requirements
- Rights of the data subject (including right to complain to supervisory authority)
- Contact information for follow-up
Example template structure:
Subject: Your Data [Access/Deletion/Correction] Request - Reference {{request_id}}
Dear {{requester_name}},
We have received your request dated {{request_date}} to [access/delete/correct] your personal data under [applicable regulation].
[Acknowledgment / verification request / fulfillment details / denial basis]
We will respond substantively by {{response_deadline}}.
[Contact information]
[Rights information]
2. Discovery Holds (Litigation Holds)
Sub-categories:
- Initial hold notice to custodians
- Hold reminder / periodic reaffirmation
- Hold modification (scope change)
- Hold release
Key template elements:
- Matter name and reference number
- Clear preservation obligations
- Scope of preservation (date range, data types, systems, communication types)
- Prohibition on spoliation
- Contact for questions
- Acknowledgment requirement
Example template structure:
Subject: LEGAL HOLD NOTICE - {{matter_name}} - Action Required
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION
Dear {{custodian_name}},
You are receiving this notice because you may possess documents, communications, or data relevant to the matter referenced above.
PRESERVATION OBLIGATION:
Effective immediately, you must preserve all documents and electronically stored information (ESI) related to:
- Subject matter: {{hold_scope}}
- Date range: {{start_date}} to present
- Document types: {{document_types}}
DO NOT delete, destroy, modify, or discard any potentially relevant materials.
[Specific instructions for systems, email, chat, local files]
Please acknowledge receipt of this notice by {{acknowledgment_deadline}}.
Contact {{legal_contact}} with any questions.
3. Privacy Inquiries
Sub-categories:
- Cookie/tracking inquiry responses
- Privacy policy questions
- Data sharing practice inquiries
- Children's data inquiries
- Cross-border transfer questions
Key template elements:
- Reference to the organization's privacy notice
- Specific answers based on current practices
- Links to relevant privacy documentation
- Contact information for the privacy team
4. Vendor Legal Questions
Sub-categories:
- Contract status inquiry response
- Amendment request response
- Compliance certification requests
- Audit request responses
- Insurance certificate requests
Key template elements:
- Reference to the applicable agreement
- Specific response to the vendor's question
- Any required caveats or limitations
- Next steps and timeline
5. NDA Requests
Sub-categories:
- Sending the organization's standard form NDA
- Accepting a counterparty's NDA (with markup)
- Declining an NDA request with explanation
- NDA renewal or extension
Key template elements:
- Purpose of the NDA
- Standard terms summary
- Execution instructions
- Timeline expectations
6. Subpoena / Legal Process
Sub-categories:
- Acknowledgment of receipt
- Objection letter
- Request for extension
- Compliance cover letter
Key template elements:
- Case reference and jurisdiction
- Specific objections (if any)
- Preservation confirmation
- Timeline for compliance
- Privilege log reference (if applicable)
Critical note: Subpoena responses almost always require individualized counsel review. Templates serve as starting frameworks, not final responses.
7. Insurance Notifications
Sub-categories:
- Initial claim notification
- Supplemental information
- Reservation of rights response
Key template elements:
- Policy number and coverage period
- Description of the matter or incident
- Timeline of events
- Requested coverage confirmation
Template Management Methodology
Template Organization
Templates should be organized by category and maintained in the team's local settings. Each template should include:
- Category: The type of inquiry the template addresses
- Template name: A descriptive identifier
- Use case: When this template is appropriate
- Escalation triggers: When this template should NOT be used
- Required variables: Information that must be customized for each use
- Template body: The response text with variable placeholders
- Follow-up actions: Standard steps after sending the response
- Last reviewed date: When the template was last verified for accuracy
Template Lifecycle
- Creation: Draft template based on best practices and team input
- Review: Legal team review and approval of template content
- Publication: Add to template library with metadata
- Use: Generate responses using the template
- Feedback: Track when templates are modified during use to identify improvement opportunities
- Update: Revise templates when laws, policies, or best practices change
- Retirement: Archive templates that are no longer applicable
Template Creation Guide
When helping users create new templates:
1. Define the Use Case
- What type of inquiry does this address?
- How frequently does this come up?
- Who is the typical audience?
- What is the typical urgency level?
2. Identify Required Elements
- What information must be included in every response?
- What regulatory requirements apply?
- What organizational policies govern this type of response?
3. Define Variables
- What changes with each use? (names, dates, specifics)
- What stays the same? (legal requirements, standard language)
- Use clear variable names:
{{requester_name}},{{response_deadline}},{{matter_reference}}
4. Draft the Template
- Write in clear, professional language
- Avoid unnecessary legal jargon for business audiences
- Include all legally required elements
- Add placeholders for all variable content
- Include a subject line template if for email use
5. Define Escalation Triggers
- What situations should NOT use this template?
- What characteristics indicate the matter needs individualized attention?
- Be specific: vague triggers are not useful
6. Add Metadata
- Template name and category
- Version number and last reviewed date
- Author and approver
- Follow-up actions checklist
Template Format
## Template: {{template_name}}
**Category**: {{category}}
**Version**: {{version}} | **Last Reviewed**: {{date}}
**Approved By**: {{approver}}
### Use When
- [Condition 1]
- [Condition 2]
### Do NOT Use When (Escalation Triggers)
- [Trigger 1]
- [Trigger 2]
### Variables
| Variable | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| {{var1}} | [what it is] | [example value] |
| {{var2}} | [what it is] | [example value] |
### Subject Line
[Subject template with {{variables}}]
### Body
[Response body with {{variables}}]
### Follow-Up Actions
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]
### Notes
[Any special instructions for users of this template]
Output Format
## Generated Response: [Inquiry Type]
**To**: [recipient]
**Subject**: [subject line]
---
[Response body]
---
### Escalation Check
[Confirmation that no escalation triggers were detected, OR flagged triggers with recommendations]
### Follow-Up Actions
1. [Post-send actions]
2. [Calendar reminders to set]
3. [Tracking or logging requirements]
Notes
- Always present the draft response for user review before suggesting it be sent
- If connected to email via MCP, offer to create a draft email with the response
- Track response deadlines and offer to set calendar reminders
- For regulated responses (DSRs, subpoenas), always note the applicable deadline and regulatory requirements
- Templates should be living documents; suggest updates when the user modifies a templated response, so the template can be improved over time
Zeplik output presentation
Present the final deliverable as a single polished artifact: clear headings, tables where the content is tabular, fenced code where it is code. Lead with the deliverable itself; keep process commentary to a single short line. If the skill produced multiple files or sections, end with a compact list of them with one-line purposes.
How to use the Legal Response Drafter skill
Sign in to Zeplik
Create a free Zeplik account or sign in. New accounts start with free credits, so you can try the Legal Response Drafter skill right away.
Describe your legal and finance task
Ask in plain language, or type /legal-response to invoke the skill directly. Zeplik recognizes the Legal Response Drafter skill and applies its method.
Review and refine the result
Zeplik returns a structured document you can edit, download, and reuse. Ask follow-ups to refine it.
Source and credit
- Author
- Anthropic
- License
- Apache-2.0
Adapted from the open-source anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins project and tuned to run natively on Zeplik. View source on GitHub.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the Legal Response Drafter skill?
- Legal Response Drafter is a ready-to-run legal and finance skill on Zeplik. Uses templates with built-in escalation checks. Ask in plain language and Zeplik applies the skill's method for you inside the conversation, on whichever AI model you prefer. It returns a structured document you can keep and reuse: Document artifact -- structured written deliverable with headed sections and a TL;DR (see artifact-templates/document.md).
- How do I use Legal Response Drafter on Zeplik?
- Sign in to Zeplik and ask in plain language, or type /legal-response in any chat to invoke it directly. The skill applies its method and returns a result you can refine in the same conversation.
- Which AI model does the Legal Response Drafter skill use?
- Any model you choose. Zeplik works across every model in one chat, so the Legal Response Drafter skill runs on your preferred model for the task.
- Where does the Legal Response Drafter skill come from?
- The Legal Response Drafter skill is adapted from the open-source anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins project (Apache-2.0) and tuned to run natively on Zeplik. The original source is linked on this page.
- How much does the Legal Response Drafter skill cost?
- Using the skill is free to start. You only spend Zeplik credits when the assistant runs, and new accounts begin with free credits.
Related legal and finance skills
- Account ReconciliationUse when the user asks to reconcile accounts -- "bank rec for June", "GL to subledger reconciliation", "intercompany rec", "find the reconciling items". Compares GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data and categorizes differences.
- Audit SupportUse when the user is preparing for an internal or external audit -- "get ready for the auditors", "build testing workpapers", "select audit samples", "classify this control deficiency". SOX 404 control testing methodology and documentation standards. Not for running a SOX testing cycle (use sox-testing).
- Cash Flow SnapshotUse when the user asks about cash flow or runway -- "forecast my cash flow", "will I make payroll", "how long is my runway", "cash crunch coming". Builds a 30/60/90-day cash forecast with confidence bands and named risk flags from books data or CSV, plus a downloadable XLSX.
- Cash-Flow Heads UpA forward-looking 30/60-day cash outlook flagging the tightest week and two things to act on. Not for reconciling and closing the books (use close-month or month-end-prep).
- Compliance CheckUse when the user asks whether a feature, campaign, or initiative is compliant -- "compliance check this launch", "does this touch GDPR or personal data", "what approvals do we need before shipping". Surfaces applicable regulations, required approvals, jurisdictional requirements, and risk areas.
- Contract ReviewUse when the user asks to review a contract -- "review this MSA", "redline this vendor agreement", "what's risky in this contract". Clause-by-clause analysis against a negotiation playbook with redlines, business impact, and fallback positions. Not for quick NDA screening (use triage-nda).
More on Zeplik
Try Legal Response Drafter on Zeplik
Every model, one chat. Bring the Legal Response Drafter skill into your next conversation and let the assistant do the work.