Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Meta's open flagship against Europe's leading lab at its capability tier.
Figures as of , read live from the model registry Zeplik bills against.
What the numbers say
- Llama 4 Maverick is about 11x cheaper on output tokens (7.8 vs 90.0 credits per 1M).
- Mistral Medium 3.5 takes noticeably more context: 262K vs 128K tokens.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is the newer release (April 2026 vs April 2025).
Derived from the live registry Zeplik routes and bills against. Credits: 1 credit = $0.10, computed from the raw provider rate with a 1.20x margin.
Side by side
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
- Provider
- Meta
- Context window
- 128K tokens
- Input price
- 2.2 credits / 1M tokens ($0.19 raw)
- Output price
- 7.8 credits / 1M tokens ($0.65 raw)
- Vision (image input)
- Yes
- Tool calling
- Yes
- Extended reasoning
- No
Best for
- Everyday chat and drafting on an open-weight model with transparent lineage
- Working with images: screenshots, charts, photos and scanned documents alongside text
- Tool use and agents: reliably calls functions, so it can search, run skills and drive workflows
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI.
- Provider
- Mistral
- Context window
- 262K tokens
- Input price
- 18.0 credits / 1M tokens ($1.50 raw)
- Output price
- 90.0 credits / 1M tokens ($7.50 raw)
- Vision (image input)
- Yes
- Tool calling
- Yes
- Extended reasoning
- No
Best for
- Hard problems where answer quality matters more than cost: strategy, analysis, difficult writing
- Long documents: the 262K-token window holds lengthy reports, contracts or papers whole
- Working with images: screenshots, charts, photos and scanned documents alongside text
- Tool use and agents: reliably calls functions, so it can search, run skills and drive workflows
Try both on Zeplik
The honest answer to most model debates is to run your own prompt on both. Zeplik puts Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5 in the same chat, so you can switch mid-conversation and compare answers on the work you actually do.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5?
- Llama 4 Maverick is about 11x cheaper on output tokens (7.8 vs 90.0 credits per 1M). Mistral Medium 3.5 takes noticeably more context: 262K vs 128K tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 is the newer release (April 2026 vs April 2025).
- Is Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5 cheaper?
- Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper: 7.8 credits per million output tokens against 90.0. 1 credit = $0.10, computed from the raw provider rate with a 1.20x margin.
- Which has the larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5?
- Mistral Medium 3.5, at 262K tokens against 128K.
- Can I use both Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5 on Zeplik?
- Yes. Zeplik is a multi-model chat, so both sit behind one account and you can switch between them mid-conversation to compare answers on your own prompt.
- Do Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5 need a paid plan?
- Both need a paid plan (Plus or above). Usage is then billed in credits from your monthly allowance.
Related comparisons
- Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423The two most-watched open-weight flagships, Meta scale against DeepSeek reasoning.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mistral Small 4Mistral's capability tier against its efficiency tier.
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.7 MaxMeta's open flagship against Alibaba's top Qwen tier.
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 ScoutLlama 4's two personalities, Maverick capability against Scout efficiency.
- Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 4 against the 3.3 workhorse a huge install base still runs.
Explore Zeplik
- 468 AI skillsReady-to-run expert methods that run on Llama 4 Maverick, Mistral Medium 3.5 or any other model.
- 997 integrationsConnect Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Notion and hundreds more so the assistant can work in your apps.
- Simple pricingPlus, Pro and Max plans with a monthly credit allowance that works across every model.